If you're a baseball fan, you know what the debate is all about, and you're more than likely to have participated in it on multiple occasions.
The basic tenet of the debate is to discuss whom amongst those currently not in the Hall of Fame should be and shouldn't be, and to compare those players to other "borderline" members of the Hall. Naturally, we're fixated on the players of our era, say the last 30 years or so, as there are plenty of interesting subjects amongst them for the sake of the debate.
Of course, we pull for Don Mattingly (even the Mets fans amongst us) and we try to justify that his five seasons of utter dominance should qualify him for the Hall. Yet, all the while we know that his injury-shortened career simply does not stack up to those of some other players of his time, and that "Donnie Baseball" must bear the rare indignity of being the best player on a bad Yankee team. Such is the case, we know that it's unlikely that Mattingly will ever make the Hall of Fame. Same can be said for Dale Murphy, whose career statistics were better than Mattingly's in some respects, but who just got mired on an awful Braves team for too much of his career, so that he never got to shine in a big moment.
But, there are other players as well, all great and recently retired, who make pretty strong cases. Jeff Bagwell, Jeff Kent, Craig Biggio, Mike Piazza, Mike Mussina, and Edgar Martinez, all were among the top players in Major League Baseball, not to mention their respective positions. By the same token, Biggio has 3,000 career hits, which has traditionally provided an automatic ticket to Cooperstown, and he may have been the best hitting second baseman ever. Yet, he did not get in last year, his first year of eligibility.
Speaking of great middle infielders, Lou Whitaker, Alan Trammell, and Tony Fernandez have been eligible for a while and if Phil Rizutto can find his way into the Hall of Fame, surely those three fine ball players can as well.
Mussina or Morris: Will either be in the Hall of Fame?
Is one more deserving than the other?
|
Throw in the shift to advanced analytics in which a new rubric of statistics is applied to determine players' true value, it's hard to know anymore exactly who belongs in the Hall of Fame anyway.
Perhaps it's not so cut and dry after all. Maybe it has more to do with a player's impact during the time in which he played than his raw skill set. Can you really compare players of one generation to another in order to decide whether or not certain players should be included in the Hall of Fame?
While this year's class of inductees- three players and three managers -is free of controversy, and their credentials are undeniable, there are generally no easy answers, and thus the debate rages on.
![]() |
Toyota Camry. Guaranteed HOFer.
|
If you think about the idea that a Hall of Fame could apply to most any facet of society, then perhaps there should be a Hall of Fame for ticketing as well.
It may seem like a bit of a stretch because while everybody seemingly enjoys live entertainment in one form or another, ticketing services, are at worst despised and at best tolerated as necessary evils. We've heard all the complaints, and they're not without merit: Prices are too high, the fees are egregious, events are sold out too quickly, and a litany of others. While prominent ticketing services like Ticketmaster are derided for their imperfections, they should also be appreciated for their efficiency among other merits.
For one thing, these ticketing services help to guarantee that certain events even take place at all. There are a lot of folks involved in putting on live entertainment, from the musicians and athletes, to the promoters and executives, all the way down to vendors and security. Needless to say, each of these deserves fair compensation, and, if you think about it, much of that compensation goes to run the respective businesses, and not necessarily into greedy pockets. If you have a great time at a concert or sporting event, in a clean, safe environment, with access to food and bathrooms; and, of course, if the show was phenomenal, the total price you paid for the ticket was worth it.
The ticketing company that gets most of the slings and arrows is the aforementioned Ticketmaster. Such is the price of success. As the preeminent ticketing source worldwide, Ticketmaster is scoffed at as a monopoly that manipulates the ticketing market and entertainment landscape. Fair only to an extent. The fact that Ticketmaster has such deeply rooted contracts with so many sports teams, concert promoters, venues, and the like is what helps to ensure that the entertainment you love keeps coming around. It simplifies the whole process. Now, when a band announces a tour, it books Ticketmaster affiliated venues, Ticketmaster handles the ticketing, and the show goes on as planned. Were this not the case, the ticketing landscape would be even worse for fans. Imagine if each time a major musician planned a tour it put its ticketing rights up for auction in each city? You'd have five companies trying to outbid each other, which would drive prices up and the tickets would never become available. The bottom line is, Ticketmaster delivers the goods as a point of initial sale, which on aggregate, makes it easier on everyone involved.
For these reasons just explained, Ticketmaster definitely would belong in the ticketing Hall of Fame. In fact, it would be the Babe Ruth of the ticketing Hall. But, there's more to it as well.
A little historical context:
| Prototype of early Ticketron Machine |
that inventory to huge automated kiosks, which looked very much like photocopiers of that era. The kiosks were placed in locations like department stores, train terminals, and other places where potential theater-goers might also be found. That way, two ladies coming to New York for the weekend for example, could purchase and print out tickets for a show they planned on seeing while buying outfits at Bloomingdales.
The Ticketron model was revolutionary, although it suffered from usual early-concept setbacks; anything from inventory not loading into the system properly which caused mis-bookings and duplicate bookings, to the system going off-line, to kiosk paper supplies jamming up.
However Ticketron's main shortcoming was that it handled ticket procurement purely regionally. It had arrangements with venues in particular markets and there was no way to offer tickets on a national scale. Although Ticketron secured contracts with professional and college sports teams, and large venues like arenas and stadiums across the country, it was impossible to purchase tickets to a game in LA, if you lived in New York.
By the time Ticketmaster came onto the scene in the mid 1970's, it had perfected the technology to offer tickets to any event, anywhere, to anyone. It also was less invested in the automated kiosk platform and based much of it's service model on call centers and properly placed manned retail outlets, which instilled a certain level of accuracy and reliability. Ticketmaster aggressively pursued and won the contracts that Ticketron had- partly because its service was superior, but also because it presented the attractive notion of higher service fees. In 1991, Ticketmaster acquired the flagging Ticketron, its assets, and technology effectively putting it out of business. In 1996, Ticketmaster began offering tickets online, thus besting its own model, providing even more convenience for the customer, and cementing its place as the ticketing industry leader.
Unquestionably, then, Ticketmaster is in the ticketing Hall of Fame. But, is this unabashed PSA for
Nobody said you had to like Ticketmaster's
fees. But, they do serve a purpose.
|
If Ticketmaster is a shoe-in for the ticketing Hall of Fame based on its prevalence in the primary ticketing space (purchasing tickets for an event directly from the source for the event), then another lock is undoubtedly StubHub.
StubHub officially began in 2000, mainly as a listing service for ticket holders who could not attend certain events for which they had tickets. It was almost like a Craigslist, except that the ticket listings did not involve any contact, either virtually or personally, between the buyer and seller. Instead, tickets were put up for sale, bulletin board style, adhering to certain listing requirements, and buyers could anonymously select whichever listing they liked just as if they were buying anything else online. That model still holds true today and StubHub has carefully developed it over the last decade and a half with interactive features and convenient listing functions intended to aide sellers and buyers alike.
![]() |
He seems nice enough, but you'd be better
off buying tickets online.
|
Brokers and other ticketing professionals, such as sports teams and venue operators also utilize StubHub to sell tickets and StubHub controls many contracts with teams, venues, and leagues to operate as their "official" reseller.
Without question, Ticketmaster and StubHub belong in the ticketing Hall of Fame for their impact and overall efficiency. Likewise, Ticketron probably does as well since it's the third party ticketing pioneer. There are also numerous lesser-known ticketing services that deserve consideration. One such is TicketNetwork, which since 2002 has been aggregating brokers' listings through its server and then offering those listings out to numerous resale sites. This provides the traditional brokers the opportunity to put their inventory online and TicketNetwork in turn guarantees inventory to countless sites. If you do enough shopping around, you can find several other resale sites, each with their own unique service model. You can even come across new entries in the primary space, such as EventBrite, which gives anybody the opportunity to create an online box office and sell tickets for any event; even birthday parties! This service is popular amongst venues and artists not aligned with Ticketmaster. Whether any of these entities is Hall worthy is ultimately a matter of impact in their historical context.
Where, then, does Seatslink fit in with all of this Hall of Fame talk?
After all, Seatslink is brand new, and its concept is still largely unproven. However, the framework for an impactful existence is there. While Seatslink has ticketing inventory for most any event in Metro New York, Seatslink's unique value add is the 15% discount that it offers throughout a growing network of local businesses, all situated near the most prominent venues in the New York City area. Seatslink understands that a night out at the ball game, concert, or theater almost always involves added expenses and activities that go well beyond the cost of tickets. Whether it's a quiet dinner before the show, a spot to party pre and post game, a fun place to bring the kids, or simply somewhere to park your car, your needs and desires in terms of having a complete event experience are varied and unique.
Soon, you'll see the Seatslink sticker
in the windows of local businesses
all over town.
|
While ticket prices are an extremely volatile subject, they can often represent less than half the total expense of a night out when you include all possible expenses, including babysitters, dinner, and parking among others. Other ticketing services offer rewards and hospitality packages for certain events, especially the higher profile ones like the Super Bowl, the Final Four, or particular stops along certain concert tours. The truth is, however, that any event can be considered "high-profile" and Seatslink helps you organize the extras at your own discretion and at a discount, so that you can enjoy yourself in the ways that are most meaningful to you.
It's about time that common misgivings with ticketing are put into perspective and that the focus should be put on the complete experiences that your tickets are part and parcel of. Buying tickets should not simply grant you admission for a live event. It should also be your ticket to a destination that can provide a thrilling night out whether the team you went to see wins, loses, or draws.
Seatslink is the only ticketing service that takes the added activities into account on a continuous basis, giving you the chance to maximize your event experience, more affordably and conveniently.
Will all this be enough to put Seatslink in the ticketing Hall of Fame? Time will tell. But, the true difference-makers in the ticketing industry are few and far between; that's why you haven't heard of many. Seatslink has the chance to make a difference because it truly is different, and not just a slight variation on the same old model.
It might be a silly debate anyway, this one about the Hall of Fame. Many baseball players, for example, are beloved for their moments of greatness, and contributions to their teams even if they don't make it into the Hall. Certain things should simply be appreciated, not debated. Hopefully Seatslink will be appreciated by many and recognized for the all-around service it provides. But, the ticketing Hall of Fame might prove to be more fickle than any other because a place in its lore is reserved for those that truly make a difference, and Seatslink is attempting to do just that.
Please visit:
www.seatslink.com
facebook.com/seatslink
twitter.com/seatslink
Ask to be added to the Seatslink mailing list: inquiry@seatslink.com
Look out for Seatslink Experience Guides coming online soon, which will highlight the events, neighborhoods, and local businesses in the area.


